imtoken will never ask for your seed phrase, private key or verification code. Always review the address, network and request details before transferring, signing or approving.
Academy

Blockchain Networks

Blockchain Networks is part of the imtoken knowledge and product center. This page explains public chains, EVM, Layer 2, gas with practical checks that can be applied across multi-chain environments.

multi-chain network illustration

Core concepts behind Blockchain Networks

On-chain activity is a sequence of independent decisions. A wrong network, address or permission can change the outcome, so the workflow should be understood before action. For Blockchain Networks, start with public chains and EVM, then place Layer 2 inside the actual workflow. This makes the principles portable across different interfaces instead of tying understanding to one screen layout.

Before acting, identify the account in use, the target network, the asset or contract involved and the on-chain action expected to occur. When gas is relevant, review fee source, request details and confirmation state. When working with block height, prefer verifiable on-chain information over a label shown by one interface.

After the action, keep enough information to check the result again, such as transaction confirmations, the network name, destination address or contract address. On-chain transactions generally cannot be reversed by a wallet acting alone. Third-party DApps and smart contracts carry their own risks, and a wallet connection does not make every request trustworthy.

Using public chains as an example, separate what you see into three layers: interface presentation, the wallet request, and the verifiable on-chain result. The interface explains context, the wallet request defines what will be signed or sent, and the chain records what actually happened. If those layers do not agree, stop and verify the network, address, contract or transaction state before continuing.

How public chains relates to EVM

A wallet connects a user to blockchain networks, but it cannot make every risk decision on the user’s behalf. Critical details still need to be reviewed directly. For Blockchain Networks, start with public chains and EVM, then place Layer 2 inside the actual workflow. This makes the principles portable across different interfaces instead of tying understanding to one screen layout.

Before acting, identify the account in use, the target network, the asset or contract involved and the on-chain action expected to occur. When gas is relevant, review fee source, request details and confirmation state. When working with block height, prefer verifiable on-chain information over a label shown by one interface.

After the action, keep enough information to check the result again, such as transaction confirmations, the network name, destination address or contract address. On-chain transactions generally cannot be reversed by a wallet acting alone. Third-party DApps and smart contracts carry their own risks, and a wallet connection does not make every request trustworthy.

Using EVM as an example, separate what you see into three layers: interface presentation, the wallet request, and the verifiable on-chain result. The interface explains context, the wallet request defines what will be signed or sent, and the chain records what actually happened. If those layers do not agree, stop and verify the network, address, contract or transaction state before continuing.

  • public chains
  • EVM
  • Layer 2
  • gas
  • block height

The practical role of Layer 2 and gas

In a multi-chain environment, three recurring questions help: which network am I on, which asset or contract is involved, and what permission am I granting? For Blockchain Networks, start with public chains and EVM, then place Layer 2 inside the actual workflow. This makes the principles portable across different interfaces instead of tying understanding to one screen layout.

Before acting, identify the account in use, the target network, the asset or contract involved and the on-chain action expected to occur. When gas is relevant, review fee source, request details and confirmation state. When working with block height, prefer verifiable on-chain information over a label shown by one interface.

After the action, keep enough information to check the result again, such as transaction confirmations, the network name, destination address or contract address. On-chain transactions generally cannot be reversed by a wallet acting alone. Third-party DApps and smart contracts carry their own risks, and a wallet connection does not make every request trustworthy.

Using Layer 2 as an example, separate what you see into three layers: interface presentation, the wallet request, and the verifiable on-chain result. The interface explains context, the wallet request defines what will be signed or sent, and the chain records what actually happened. If those layers do not agree, stop and verify the network, address, contract or transaction state before continuing.

Using block height and transaction confirmations to make better decisions

Interfaces can look similar while pointing to different networks, contracts and account permissions. Visual similarity is never enough to establish that two actions are equivalent. For Blockchain Networks, start with public chains and EVM, then place Layer 2 inside the actual workflow. This makes the principles portable across different interfaces instead of tying understanding to one screen layout.

Before acting, identify the account in use, the target network, the asset or contract involved and the on-chain action expected to occur. When gas is relevant, review fee source, request details and confirmation state. When working with block height, prefer verifiable on-chain information over a label shown by one interface.

After the action, keep enough information to check the result again, such as transaction confirmations, the network name, destination address or contract address. On-chain transactions generally cannot be reversed by a wallet acting alone. Third-party DApps and smart contracts carry their own risks, and a wallet connection does not make every request trustworthy.

Using gas as an example, separate what you see into three layers: interface presentation, the wallet request, and the verifiable on-chain result. The interface explains context, the wallet request defines what will be signed or sent, and the chain records what actually happened. If those layers do not agree, stop and verify the network, address, contract or transaction state before continuing.

On this pageCore concepts behind Blockchain NetworksHow public chains relates to EVMThe practical role of Layer 2 and gasUsing block height and transaction confirmations to make better decisions